Thursday, May 21, 2020

Essay on Not Permiting Euthanasia the Mercy Killing

Euthanasia is an issue that has been in the center of many heated debates for several years. It is prohibited in all fifty states of the United States under homicide laws and in England with a fourteen year imprisonment, but it is legal in Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands (â€Å"Euthanasia and Physician†). Euthanasia comes from the ancient Greek word euthanatos, which means easy death. Today, the definition of euthanasia is the direct killing of a person with a disabi ¬lity or terminal illness to relieve them of their sufferings. Very often people will call euthanasia mercy killing mainly because the method is to put a person out of their pain (â€Å"Euthanasia†). Euthanasia can be done by either taking actions or not providing what is†¦show more content†¦No humans should have the authority to take the life of themselves or anyone else, even if it is desired by relatives, friends, medical employees, or themselves. Doing so interrupts the arrang ement God has established for us on Earth as humans (â€Å"Euthanasia and Physician†). The practice of euthanasia can lead to abuse. Euthanasia sends out the message it is better for a person to be dead rather than sick or disabled. Not only does that devalue a person’s status as a human but puts them at risk. Because euthanasia is mercy killing, or the deliberate ending of a person who has a condition that cannot be healed, someone can kill a person who does not want to die and use euthanasia as a cover for their crime. Simply saying, euthanasia can be abused and used as murder (â€Å"Euthanasia and Physician†). Although, one of the many opposing arguments medics use is that medical resources are scarce, and letting people who want to die undergo euthanasia would free those resources to treat people who want to live. The world needs to remember that every human life is valuable and is more valuable than mere medical resources. Agreed, medical resources are essential and limited but implying that it is a waste to use them on a person who wants to die is similar to saying that that person does not deserve to live because they are not as important compared to medications or another person’s life. As soon as a

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Homosexual Roles And Its Effect On Society - 1597 Words

Throughout history, especially in recent years, there has been a dramatic change in LGBTQ+ rights. With this change, many homosexual themes and characters are prominently occurring across global cinema and television. With the recent legalisation of same-sex marriage in the UK and in the USA, we’re seeing a push for equality, acceptance and predominantly, normality. However, these views are rarely being reflected in modern or mainstream cinema. These films habitually present themselves with a lack of diverse stories or representation, with many of them sinking into the similar tropes and conventions, leading them to be heavily criticised by individuals who identify as homosexual. By exploring films throughout history that include†¦show more content†¦The only way to have homosexual characters in the films during this period was present homosexuality as a crime such as in Caged (1950), where the lesbian characters were in prison being â€Å"punished† for their desires. This system managed to erase homosexuality to all but villains, making homosexual individuals to feel â€Å"unnatural† and that something is wrong with them. Since depictions of homosexuality wouldn’t pass the censors, filmmakers found a creative way to sneak around the code. This can be applied throughout the history of cinema; a specific example is Rebel Without a Cause (1955), which was the first mainstream Hollywood film to depict homosexual desire. In the film, the colour red is used as a repeated motif, the title of the film was in red, including the clothing that the main three characters wear to link them together. A connotation of the repeated use of the colour red would show an importance of representing danger, anger, love and passion. Plato’s character seemingly desired Jim in the film, which links to the love and passion of the red displayed throughout the film. However, the homosexuality was only indirectly expressed through the characters in the film, as it was produced during the period where The Hays Code was active, with homosexuality still being illegal in mostShow MoreRelatedThe Rise Of The Civil Rights Movement1179 Words   |  5 Pagesprotest, many African Americans, women, and homosexuals were able to gain recognition and break down the walls of discrimination and segregations. Out of the numerous elements that arose in the 1960s, there are three movements that truly affected the American society. Firstly, the rise of the civil rights movement was greatly influenced by racial discrimination of colored people in the South. Secondly, the women’s movement aimed to convince the society that women are capable of achieving and maintainingRead MoreThe Relationship Between Religious Institutions And Society1456 Words   |  6 Pagesdebate on the propriety of a coexisting homosexual Christian. This has been a concern in not only the Catholic Church, but sub-religions within the entire Christian community. It is interesting to comprehend the relationship between religious organizations and society—mainly how one influences the other in doctrines, values, and beliefs, specifically in regards to homosexuality. Regarding the relationship between Christian religious institutions, society, and homosexuality, the articles shouldRead MoreThe Mexican Culture And Hegemonic Masculinity Essay1572 Words   |  7 Pagesdo not accept homosexuality. It is considered a sin. It is rejected among many cultures. In the Mexican culture, hegemonic masculinity: the way a man uses control and power over others, presents a series of roles, attitudes and traits that men need to follow to be considered a man in society. Some of these traits are physical strength, goal oriented, having control and being the breadwinner of the family. When a man in the Mexican culture shows signs of homoerotic desires, they are basically putRead MoreCritical Analysis of Schulmans Article Gay Marriage and Marriage963 Words   |  4 Pagesheavily heated amongst individuals? Is it that religion is a large structure base that those in society are guided by? Or is it that individuals do not understand that marriage is a union betwe en two individuals who are in love? Whatever the case may be, there is always someone who has to argue that homosexual marriage is â€Å"wrong.† Sam Schulman argues that homosexual marriage is about the duties or roles that these couples perform that would be different from that of heterosexual couples. In his articleRead MoreSame Sex Marriage Should Be Legal1533 Words   |  7 Pages Homosexual Marriage Not too long ago, homosexual man and woman were victims of physical and verbal violence. Just because they were born with a different preference, they were insulted, discriminated, beaten and isolated from society. They were the ones being shamed for what they were, and made to believe that what they felt towards another individual was morally wrong and against humanity. Over the past decades same-sex relations were never consideredRead MoreHow the Media has Influenced Peoples Thoughts on homosexuality1410 Words   |  6 Pagesdifferently by society. Although there are many people who think there is nothing wrong with being gay, there are many who still believe it is immoral and abnormal. With all the diverse views floating around about homosexuals different portrayals and stereotypes can and have definitely derived from everywhere. These portrayals send intentional or sometimes even unintentional messages to the people on the receiving end of those messages, thereby shaping how th ose people view homosexuals. Since the mediaRead MoreGays Should Have A Positive Impact On A Child s Life1441 Words   |  6 Pages In our fast paced society the Norms are changing and evolving for Homosexuals and their rights. Every child in foster care, and adoption agencies deserve to have a family regardless of the parents Sexual orientation. The United States is considered a liberal country if that is so, then homosexuals should have the right to adopt a child in the United States. Homosexuals adopting will have a positive impact on a child s life. The child will finally have a stable home and family to grow up inRead MoreHomosexual Lifestyle Is Extremely Harmful1094 Words   |  5 PagesHomosexual lifestyle is extremely harmful A question many people have is, what harm is it to allow same-sex couples the same benefits married heterosexual couples have? Or what harm is there in allowing gays to fill authoritative positions in society who act as role models for our children? The answer is that it is extremely harmful to our children and society as a whole. If our children have role models who are gay, they will think being gay is something that is acceptable by society. Read MoreThe Social Influences Of Gay Men And Homosexuals1536 Words   |  7 PagesHeterosexual orientation in many countries, and in many different cultures are the norm. While homosexual orientation is not. These negative reactions towards gays and lesbians like most things, have been learned. The social influences that we are exposed to affects how we act towards homosexuals. The pressure of what it means to be a boy or a girl is highly placed upon us at very early age. It helps us shape our minds about what it means to be a male or a female, and what we think about gender.Read MoreEssay The Psychology of Human Sexuality in The Bird Cage1249 Words   |  5 PagesThe Psychology of Human Sexuality in The Bird Cage #9;The Bird Cage, Starring Nathan Lane and Robbin Williams is a film that explores societies views of homosexuals through the medium of humor. By creating outrageously stereotyped homosexual men, the director, Mike Nichols creates an awareness in his viewers of the biases and stereotypes that they hold . The two gay male leads, Albert and Armand are owners of a nightclub in South Beach Florida. Armand (played by Robin Williams) is in a long-term

Gun Control Research Essay Free Essays

ProCon. org recently featured an article that studied gun control. â€Å"Stricter state gun laws associated with fewer gun deaths, study finds. We will write a custom essay sample on Gun Control Research Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now † The article discussed gun control laws in states with stricter laws tend to have lower rates of gun related homicides, and a suicide (ProCon para. 1) Gun control in the United States is becoming a wide spread issue and is becoming a problem everywhere. Although I am living in a city with uprising crime that has been skyrocketing over the years, I wasn’t aware of this being an issue all over the United States. I decided to do some research to find out whether I am in favor of Gun control laws or not. After reviewing many articles for and against gun control, I found out that I do in fact agree with gun control laws. It became difficult to determine my side of the controversy due to there being a lot of negative and positive opinions about the issue. I feel like gun laws should be in place to restore our countries gun related crime rates in the U. S. The ProCon article argues that states with the strictest gun control laws have lower rates of gun related homicides and suicides. The argument for gun control laws revolve around the statistics of gun control laws being stricter in certain states verses states with not so strict gun control laws. According to ProCon, â€Å"the most restrictive gun control laws have an average of 6. 64 fewer deaths per 100,000 people per year than those with the least restrictive laws† (ProConpara. 1). ProCon continues on to discuss the study â€Å"Firearm Legislation and Firearm Related Fatalities in the United States,† that was studied by different researchers that measured the association between the â€Å"legislative strength of state gun control policies† (ProCon para. 1). The researchers then began to study the five categories used to create the legislative strength score which included laws designed to: curb firearm trafficking; strengthen background checks on purchasers of firearms beyond those required by Brandy Handgun Violence Prevention Act; ensure child safety; ban military style assault weapons; and restrict guns in public places (ProCon para. 1). The researchers then ranked all 50 states from 0 to 28 based on their score (ProCon para. 2). â€Å"The higher the score, the more restrictive the gun laws in that state,† stated the researchers (ProCon para. 2). â€Å"This study is a very important addition to our understanding of the connection between gun control and gun violence,† said John Roman, a PhD, senior fellow. â€Å"In addition to the general relationship between gun safety laws firearm deaths, also suggests that increasing the number of gun safety laws increases the reductions in firearm related deaths. So the benefits just get bigger with more laws† (ProCon para. 3). After reading the ProCon article, I found myself agreeing with the researchers. I can see different levels of gun related crimes all over the United States. Just by living in Fort Wayne, IN where there has been a peak in gun related crimes and deaths gives me proof that their study was indeed accurate. If more states had stricter gun control laws they would start to have lower rates of gun related homicides and suicides. Next, I went to an article by Chuck Baldwin, an American Politician, who disagreed with gun control laws: â€Å"Here we go again. We have another mass shooting at yet another â€Å"gun free† zone. Not only was the location a â€Å"gun free zone, it was located inside the nation’s capital, which has some of the strictest gun-control laws in the entire country,† Stated Chuck Baldwin, (Baldwin para. 1). Mr. Baldwin clearly has a strong disagreement about gun control laws in the United States. In the title of the article, he stated, â€Å"Guns don’t kill people; gun control laws kill people† (Baldwin para. 1). Mr. Baldwin then proceeds to talk about people basically abusing gun control laws and that they are useless because people are still using guns in â€Å"gun free† zones. Mr. Baldwin argued, â€Å"I thought gun-control laws and â€Å"gun-free† zones were supposed to protect people from gun violence† (Baldwin para. 1). Mr. Baldwin proceeded to argue that â€Å"Gun-Free† zones are actually â€Å"Free Killing† zones (Baldwin para. 1). He then went on to explain how â€Å"This is the second time in recent memory when some wacko shoots up a military installation† (Baldwin para. 2). I feel like Mr. Baldwin’s logic behind gun control laws is kind of persuasive because even though there are gun control laws, and â€Å"gun free† zones, doesn’t mean that people are going to stop committing gun related crimes in places where there are laws in place. I expected that I might be swayed by Mr. Baldwin’s information, but I was not. I am definitely in favor of gun control laws. I also think that Mr. Baldwin’s argument was kind of true and he had a lot of good reasoning, but I still think that by enforcing gun control laws helps a lot of states to lower their gun related crimes. However, I did not see anything on Chuck Baldwin’s article that proved gun control laws were good or bad. The final article that convinced me of my position came from the Congressional Digest. The article, â€Å"Prevalence of Gun Use and the Regulatory Response† doesn’t focus on one side of the issue. Instead, it focuses on the different reasons gun control laws could or could not be effective. Some argue that the low violent crime rates of other countries have nothing to do with gun control, maintaining instead that multiple cultural differences are responsible (Gun para. 1). â€Å"Through the years, legislative proposals to restrict the availability of firearms to the public have raised the following questions: â€Å"What restrictions on firearms are permissible under the Constitution? Does gun control constitute crime control? Can the Nation’s rates of homicide, robbery, and assault be reduced by the stricter regulation of firearms commerce or ownership? Would restrictions stop attacks on public figures or thwart deranged persons and terrorists? Would household, street corner, and schoolyard disputes are less lethal if firearms were more difficult and expensive to acquire? Would more restrictive gun control policies have the unintended effect of impairing citizens’ means of self-defense? † (Gun para. 2) This article provided a lot of questions that I asked myself and I answered â€Å"yes† to more than half of the previous questions. I had not considered these questions until I read the Congressional Digest. I think that if the government really cracked down on gun control laws, people would actually see a change in gun related crimes. I feel like yes, more restrictive gun control policies have unintended effect of impairing citizens’, and yes different cultural differences have nothing to do with gun control issues. After reading these articles on gun control laws, I am now more informed and can still say that gun control laws still should be enforced. I am surprised at the different views this issue has received. I found out that I do in fact agree with gun control laws. It became difficult to determine my side of the controversy due to there being a lot of negative and positive opinions about the issue. I feel like gun laws should be in place to restore our countries gun related crime rates and fatalities in the U. S. How to cite Gun Control Research Essay, Essays